Posted by: Indonesian Children | August 10, 2009

Diagnosis and Treatment of Feeding Disorders in Children With Developmental Disabilities

PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 3 September 2001, pp. 671-676

Diagnosis and Treatment of Feeding Disorders in Children With Developmental Disabilities

Steven M. Schwarz, MD*, , Julissa Corredor, MD*, Julie Fisher-Medina, MS , Jennifer Cohen, MD*, and Simon Rabinowitz, MD, PhD*

From the * Department of Pediatrics and the  Stanley S. Lamm Institute for Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Long Island College Hospital, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.

 

    ABSTRACT 
 Top
 Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

Objectives.  To determine the results of diagnostic evaluation and the effects of nutritional intervention on energy consumption, weight gain, growth, and clinical status of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and suspected feeding disorders.

Methods.  We studied 79 children with moderate to severe motor or cognitive dysfunction (male:female, 38:41; age, 5.8 ± 3.7 years) who were referred for diagnosis and treatment of feeding or nutritional problems. Initial assessments included a 3-day calorie intake record, videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring, milk scintigraphy, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Results.  These studies demonstrated gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with or without aspiration in 44 of 79 patients (56%), oropharyngeal dysphagia in 21 (27%), and aversive feeding behaviors in 14 (18%). Diagnosis-specific approaches included medical GER therapy in 20 patients (25%), fundoplication plus gastrostomy tube (GT) in 18 (23%), oral supplements in 17 (22%), feeding therapy only in 14 (18%), and GT only in 10 (13%). After 24.6 ± 3.0 months, relative calorie intake, expressed as intake (kcal/d)/recommended daily allowance (RDA, kcal/d), improved significantly (initial:final = 0.78 ± 0.36:1.23 ± 0.27). The z scores increased significantly for both weight (initial:final =  2.80 ± 1.33: 0.81 ± 0.69) and height ( 3.14 ± 0.98: 2.00 ± 0.67). Improved subcutaneous tissue stores were demonstrated by increased thickness of both subscapular skinfolds (change = 71% ± 26%) and triceps skinfolds (38% ± 17%). After nutritional intervention, the acute care hospitalization rate, compared with the 2-year period before intervention, decreased from 0.4 ± 0.18 to 0.15 ± 0.06 admissions per patient-year and included only 3 admissions (0.02 per patient-year) related to feeding problems.

Conclusions.  In children with developmental disabilities, diagnosis-specific treatment of feeding disorders results in significantly improved energy consumption and nutritional status. These data also indicate that decreased morbidity (reflected by a lower acute care hospitalization rate) may be related, at least in part, to successful management of feeding problems. Our results emphasize the importance of a structured approach to these problems, and we propose a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for children with developmental disabilities and suspected feeding disorders.children, developmental disabilities, fundoplication, gastroesophageal reflux, gastrostomy, hospitalization, nutrition.

Children with developmental disabilities are at increased risk for developing feeding-related difficulties, including gastroesophageal reflux (GER), oral motor dysfunction, pharyngoesophageal dyskinesia, and aversive feeding behavior.1-3 Protein energy intake and nutritional status often are compromised as a consequence of feeding impairment, particularly among the most severely disabled patients. If not adequately treated, feeding disorders may result in additional complications including esophagitis, reactive airway disease, aspiration pneumonia, and bedsores. Previous reports indicate that enteral feeding regimens for nutrition support in developmentally disabled children improve overall nutritional status.To date, however, few investigations have evaluated the effects of diagnosis-specific nutritional therapies on clinical outcomes with respect to the frequency of feeding disorder-related complications and rates of acute care hospitalization. Accordingly, the objectives of the present study were to assess feeding problems in a large group of children with developmental disabilities and to determine the effects of nutritional management on growth, weight gain, and feeding-associated morbidity.

 

    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
  1. Dahl M, Thommessen M, Rasmussen M, Selberg T Feeding and nutritional characteristics in children with moderate or severe cerebral palsy. Acta Paediatr. 1996; 6:697-701
  2. Reilly S, Skuse D, Poblete X Prevalence of feeding problems and oral motor dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy: a community survey. J Pediatr. 1996; 6:877-882
  3. Gisel EG, Birnbaum R, Schwartz S Feeding impairments in children: diagnosis and effective intervention. Int J Orofac Myology. 1998; 24:27-33
  4. Stallings VA, Zemel BS, Davies JC, Cronk CE, Charney EB Energy expenditure of children and adolescents with severe disabilities: a cerebral palsy model. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996; 4:627-634
  5. Rempel GR, Colwell SO, Nelson RP Growth in children with cerebral palsy fed via gastrostomy. Pediatrics. 1988; 82:857-862 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Sanders KD, Cox K, Cannon R, Growth response to enteral feeding by children with cerebral palsy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990; 14:23-26 [Abstract]
  7. Bohmer CJ, Niezen-de Boer MC, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Deville WL, Nadorp JH, Meuwissen SG The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:804-810 [Medline]
  8. Rogers B, Stratton P, Msall M, Long-term morbidity and management strategies of tracheal aspiration in adults with severe developmental disabilities. Am J Ment Retard 1994; 98:490-498 [Medline]
  9. Brant CQ, Stanich P, Ferrari AP Jr Improvement in children’s nutritional status after enteral feeding by PEG: an interim report. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50:183-188 [CrossRef][Medline]
  10. National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board. Recommended Dietary Allowances. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989
  11. Cully WJ, Middleton TO Caloric requirements of mentally retarded children with and without motor dysfunction. J Pediatr 1969; 75:380-386 [CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Krick J, Murphy PE, Markham JF, Shapiro BK A proposed formula for calculating energy needs of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1992; 34:481-487 [Medline]
  13. Lefton-Greif MA, Crawford TO, Winkelstein JA, Oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration in patients with ataxia-telangiectasia. J Pediatr 2000; 136:225-231 [CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Rosario JA, Medow MS, Halata MS, Non-specific esophageal motility disorders in children without gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 28:480-485 [CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Hill LD, Kozarek RA, Kraemer SJ, The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:541-547 [CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Puntis JW, Thwaites R, Abel G, Stringer MD Children with neurological disorders do not always need fundoplication concomitant with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42:97-99 [CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Dickerson RN, Brown RO, Gervasio JG, Hak EB, Hak LJ, Williams JE Measured energy expenditure of tube-fed patients with severe neurodevelopmental disabilities. J Am Coll Nutr 1999; 18:61-68 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chad KE, McKay HA, Zello GA, Bailey DA, Failkener RA, Snyder RE Body composition in nutritionally adequate ambulatory and non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and a healthy reference group. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42:334-339 [CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Smith SW, Camfield C, Camfield P Living with cerebral palsy and tube feeding: a population-based follow-up study. J Pediatr 1999; 135:307-310 [CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Mollitt DL, Golladay ES, Seibert JJ Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux following gastrostomy in neurologically impaired patients. Pediatrics 1985; 75:1124-1126 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Berezin S, Schwarz SM, Newman LJ, Halata M Gastroesophageal reflux secondary to gastrostomy tube placement. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140:699-701 [Abstract]
  22. Wheatley MJ, Wesley JR, Tkach DM, Coran AG Long-term follow-up of brain-damaged children requiring feeding gastrostomy: should an antireflux procedure always be performed? J Pediatr Surg 1991; 26:301-304 [CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Stringel G Gastrostomy with antireflux properties. J Pediatr Surg 1990; 25:1019-1021 [CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Borowitz SM, Sutphen JL, Hutcheson RL Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy without an antireflux procedure in neurologically disabled children. Clin Pediatr 1997; 36:25-29
  25. Vandenplas Y, Belli DC, Benatar A, The role of Cisapride in the treatment of pediatric gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 28:518-528 [CrossRef][Medline]

 

Supported by

PICKY EATERS CLINIC

KLINIK KHUSUS KESULITAN MAKAN PADA ANAK

JL TAMAN BENDUNGAN ASAHAN 5 JAKARTA PUSAT, JAKARTA INDONESIA 10210

PHONE :62 (021) 70081995 – 5703646

Email : judarwanto@gmail.com

https://mypickyeaters.wordpress.com/

 

Clinical and Editor in Chief :

DR WIDODO JUDARWANTO

email : judarwanto@gmail.com,

 

Copyright © 2009, Picky Eaters Clinic Information Education Network. All rights reserved.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories